31 October 2021



Shockwaves reverberated around the cycling community last week when a jury returned a ‘not proven’ verdict against a car driver, Jordan McDowall, following a Trial at the High Court in Glasgow.

The 21-year-old was acquitted of causing the death of 51year old cyclist, Kevin Gilchrist, by dangerous driving. Kevin, a husband and father of 3, was killed in 2018.

Jordan McDowall plead ‘not guilty’ to the charge of causing death by dangerous driving, claiming that she had no recollection of the incident and there was a gap in her memory. 

Many in the Scottish cycling community questioned whether the decision of the jury meant that you could get off with anything by simply claiming that you can’t remember the incident. This was not a case where the driver argued she had some new or sudden medical condition, of which she was not previously aware – she stated that she simply could not recall what had happened and explained there was a ‘gap’ in her memory. Colin Allanach, Chair of Scottish Cycling Grampian and the Grampian Cycle Partnership, commented, ‘Is it open season on cyclists now?’ and, as a cyclist myself, it’s hard to not to agree with him. However, the outcome of the case was not one of ‘not guilty’ but rather ‘not proven’ and a decision made by a jury.  So, whilst the young driver was able to walk free from Court, it is still possible that another charge can be brought if further evidence is discovered.

Although the decision is controversial, the legal defence behind it is perhaps even more so and wasn’t widely reported in the coverage of the case. In criminal law, to be convicted of most crimes, it must be shown that you have criminal intent – either through wickedness or recklessness. However, if it can be shown that the accused was not in control of their actions due to no fault of their own and have no knowledge of the incident, then a defence of automatism will be argued and can be sufficient to secure acquittal.

Automatism is one of the six special defences to a crime in Scotland (along with self-defence, necessity, alibi, incrimination and insanity). Automatism is where someone involuntary loses control of their body through no fault of their own. For example, if a driver with no previous medical history, suddenly and without warning, suffers an unexpected epileptic fit whilst driving and kills or injures another road user, they could use the defence of automatism against criminal charges.

Whilst automatism is a defence to criminal charges, what is its place in civil law? Is it fair and equitable that it can also be used as full defence in civil cases thus denying compensation to those injured or bereaved by a driver who had no control of his or her actions at the point of collision?

In civil cases for damages, it is up to the injured person to establish negligence. There can be no negligence if the action of a driver is involuntary. This means that compensation can be denied to those injured through no fault of their own. Take the same example above, where the driver who suffers an unexpected epileptic fit causes life-changing injuries to a young woman, meaning she will suffer life-long pain and will never work again. The driver is fully insured and yet despite a valid policy of insurance, the young woman cannot recover compensation for her injuries and loss.

Where automatism is argued in a civil case, it is up to the defender, often an insurer, to establish their policyholder was not in control of their actions. Careful investigation of these cases can defeat the defence of automatism often by scrutiny of medical records and detailed investigation as to the general health of a driver in the days prior to the collision. However, I would argue in a legal system where there is already in place compulsory insurance for drivers, the defence of automatism ought to be removed for civil cases, to allow those injured through no fault of their own, to obtain compensation for their injuries and tragically, as was the case for the family of Kevin Gilchrist, the loss of their loved ones.

Read all our latest news


9 June 2022

Big buzz about electric transportation

A new Low speed, Zero Emission Vehicle category is likely to be introduced by DfT in a new Transport Bill. E-scooters are likely to be the first to be introduced within this class. 

Read More >


20 February 2022

The new Highway Code – what’s all the fuss about?

Safe and courteous road users have nothing to worry about as far as the new Highway code rules are concerned


Read More >


16 November 2021

Road Safety Week 2021

RTALS are supporting Road Safety Week 2021 recognising the work undertaken by our Road Safety heroes. 

Read More >


31 October 2021


A defence in automatism has no place in Civil Law

Read More >


2 September 2021

It's all in the balance

Working a 4 day week may sound strange to many, but if a busy Law firm can make it work, then surely others will be able to follow suit.

Read More >


21 March 2021


When it comes to the question of who’s to blame in a road traffic incident, sometimes it is not entirely clear. 

Read More >


26 January 2021

The Courts are getting there virtually

There can be no going backwards now for the Civil courts after accepting a new virtual system for Court hearings.

Read More >


9 December 2020

Independent ethos

Remaining independent is part of our ethos. All our cases are generated organically. We never purchase cases from insurers and we don't work with referral companies. 

Read More >


29 November 2020

Swift v Carpenter judgement

In times of negative discount rates, we finally have a more equitable approach to calculating the costs of accommodation costs thanks to the Swift v Carpenter decision.


Read More >


24 November 2020

Case Law and accidents on icy roads

Compensation claims for road traffic incidents caused by icy roads are inherently difficult to win but a recent case, Smithson v Lynn, has changed this position. 

Read More >


6 October 2020

Behind the mask

Personal injury claimants should beware that insurers are looking at your social media profiles and activity. Of course, what is portrayed is not always representative of what is actually going on 'behind the mask.' 

Read More >


13 May 2020


In this interview with adventurer, speaker and now Champion cyclist, Jaco van Gass, we find out how he overcame the loss of an arm through acceptance and then developed and achieved new goals through positive mental attitude and shear resilience.


Read More >


20 April 2020

It's time to restart our beating heart

Whilst Insurers and Law firms operating within the Civil Justice system in Scotland have successfully adapted their working practices in order to continue to progress cases, the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service has simply shut up shop.

Read More >


16 April 2020

The Rainbow Children

Rainbows are popping up all across the country and are synonymous with hope and tolerance across the world.

Read More >


9 April 2020

Working from home

Ewen Stewart, Legal Assistant, at RTALS has predominantly worked from home for over 20 years so has plenty of tips for those who are new to homeworking due to Covid-19 restrictions. He has had to make some adjustments to his own way of working though too.

Read More >


1 April 2020

Searching for the positives

When the world seems to have ground to a halt and life as we know it has been put on hold, it can be very easy to feel down and lost. It is important to search for the positives.

Read More >


8 March 2020

Dear Sirs

It's time the use of 'Dear Sirs" as a method of addressing an individual is reviewed. After all, we are in 2020.

Read More >


31 October 2019

Do you trust insurers?

Consumer trust in insurance companies is falling. Would you trust them to appoint a Lawyer in the event of injury following a road traffic collision?

Read More >


29 October 2019

It's getting increasingly technical

For lawyers working in the field of personal injury, keeping abreast of the latest available equipment for an injured client is vital. Complex injuries demand innovative and complex solutions to aid client rehabilitation.

Read More >


Motorcycle Law Scotland Logo

Motorcycle Law Scotland is a unique legal service for injured motorcyclists following a road traffic collision in Scotland. We aim to ensure that motorcyclists and their families receive the best possible legal advice and support.

Our dynamic team of experienced legal experts are also motorcyclists. As specialists, our knowledge of motorcycling incidents, motorcyclists’ needs, motorcycles and the Law is second to none.

We see our clients, and sometimes their family members face to face, so we get to know them well.

Our clients trust us because we speak their language.

Pedestrian Law Scotland

Pedestrian Law Scotland provides specialist personal injury legal representation for pedestrians involved in road traffic incidents in Scotland.

If you've been injured in a road traffic collison as a pedestrian in Scotland within the last three years through no fault of your own, you may be entitled to claim compensation for your loss, injury or damage.

We work on a 'no win no fee' basis and can provide access to justice at no financial risk to you. We will fund your case from start to finish.

Just fill in the contact form or give us a call to discuss your case with one of our specialist Lawyers.

Cycle Law Scotland logo

Cycle Law Scotland is a specialist personal injury legal service for cyclists who have been injured on Scotland's roads through no fault of their own.

The team of legal experts are also all cyclists themselves. As specialists, our knowledge of cycling incidents, cyclists’ needs, bicycles and the Law is second to none.

We like to meet all our clients and sometimes their families personally, so we get to know them well. 

We're passionate about providing the best possible service for our clients and our prime focus is to get them fit again and back on their bikes.

To discuss your potential claim for injury, damage or loss, just contact us.





All correspondence should be addressed or delivered to:
Road Traffic Accident Law (Scotland) LLP
16-20 Castle Street,



If you have been involved in a road traffic collision, you can contact us below at an address nearest to you or if you prefer to use our online enquiry form just give your name and number and one of our specialist lawyers will contact you.



4 Redheughs Rigg Westpoint,
South Gyle,
EH12 9DQ


1 West Regent Street,
G2 1RW



One Marischal Square,
Broad Street,
Aberdeen, AB10 1BL


5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
Peebles, EH45 9BU