31 October 2021



Shockwaves reverberated around the cycling community last week when a jury returned a ‘not proven’ verdict against a car driver, Jordan McDowall, following a Trial at the High Court in Glasgow.

The 21-year-old was acquitted of causing the death of 51year old cyclist, Kevin Gilchrist, by dangerous driving. Kevin, a husband and father of 3, was killed in 2018.

Jordan McDowall plead ‘not guilty’ to the charge of causing death by dangerous driving, claiming that she had no recollection of the incident and there was a gap in her memory. 

Many in the Scottish cycling community questioned whether the decision of the jury meant that you could get off with anything by simply claiming that you can’t remember the incident. This was not a case where the driver argued she had some new or sudden medical condition, of which she was not previously aware – she stated that she simply could not recall what had happened and explained there was a ‘gap’ in her memory. Colin Allanach, Chair of Scottish Cycling Grampian and the Grampian Cycle Partnership, commented, ‘Is it open season on cyclists now?’ and, as a cyclist myself, it’s hard to not to agree with him. However, the outcome of the case was not one of ‘not guilty’ but rather ‘not proven’ and a decision made by a jury.  So, whilst the young driver was able to walk free from Court, it is still possible that another charge can be brought if further evidence is discovered.

Although the decision is controversial, the legal defence behind it is perhaps even more so and wasn’t widely reported in the coverage of the case. In criminal law, to be convicted of most crimes, it must be shown that you have criminal intent – either through wickedness or recklessness. However, if it can be shown that the accused was not in control of their actions due to no fault of their own and have no knowledge of the incident, then a defence of automatism will be argued and can be sufficient to secure acquittal.

Automatism is one of the six special defences to a crime in Scotland (along with self-defence, necessity, alibi, incrimination and insanity). Automatism is where someone involuntary loses control of their body through no fault of their own. For example, if a driver with no previous medical history, suddenly and without warning, suffers an unexpected epileptic fit whilst driving and kills or injures another road user, they could use the defence of automatism against criminal charges.

Whilst automatism is a defence to criminal charges, what is its place in civil law? Is it fair and equitable that it can also be used as full defence in civil cases thus denying compensation to those injured or bereaved by a driver who had no control of his or her actions at the point of collision?

In civil cases for damages, it is up to the injured person to establish negligence. There can be no negligence if the action of a driver is involuntary. This means that compensation can be denied to those injured through no fault of their own. Take the same example above, where the driver who suffers an unexpected epileptic fit causes life-changing injuries to a young woman, meaning she will suffer life-long pain and will never work again. The driver is fully insured and yet despite a valid policy of insurance, the young woman cannot recover compensation for her injuries and loss.

Where automatism is argued in a civil case, it is up to the defender, often an insurer, to establish their policyholder was not in control of their actions. Careful investigation of these cases can defeat the defence of automatism often by scrutiny of medical records and detailed investigation as to the general health of a driver in the days prior to the collision. However, I would argue in a legal system where there is already in place compulsory insurance for drivers, the defence of automatism ought to be removed for civil cases, to allow those injured through no fault of their own, to obtain compensation for their injuries and tragically, as was the case for the family of Kevin Gilchrist, the loss of their loved ones.

 RTA LAW Scotland - Guiding you through the uknown


18 March 2024

Inspiring inclusion every day

The campaign theme for International Women's Day 2024 was Inspire Inclusion.

Read More >


26 January 2024

Road Crime and the Life time sentence myth

Summary of a RoadPeace webinar discussing road crime and why no one ever receives a lifetime sentence for killing someone by dangerous driving.

Read More >


22 December 2023

Empowering tomorrow's legal minds

A peek into my journey hosting work experience at RTA Law LLP with students from Peebles High School.

Read More >


11 December 2023

Eradicating the element of surprise

Brenda Mitchell, Senior Partner discusses the benefits of an Advanced driving course with The Institute of Advanced Motorists.

Read More >


24 November 2023

Twenty's plenty for us, isn’t it?

The key focus of Road Safety Week 2023 is on 'speed' so a debate about the introduction of 20mph speed limits is inevitable.

Read More >


12 November 2023

What's going on at the MIB

An increase in the time taken to process claims, a reduction in employee numbers and a significant hike in Directors remuneration is unacceptable and utterly shameful.

Read More >


31 August 2023

Work Experience for young students

We were delighted to be able to offer some work experience to two young students who wanted to find out more about what it's like to work in a niche practice law firm.

Read More >


16 July 2023

Poor maintenance causes increase in deaths

According to figures obtained from Police Scotland, road defects, especially potholes, have been blamed for 15 deaths and over 700 injuries since 2013 

Read More >


22 May 2023

The new autonomous future

Certainly, whilst it seems the future is already here, remote driving remains a legal grey area as its neither prohibited nor expressly allowed under current legislation.

Read More >


26 March 2023

Stormy seas for defence of automatism

The defence of automatism should not mean that parties injured due to the negligence of another should be left exposed and unprotected.

Read More >


23 February 2023

Improving Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrian fatalities appear to be on the increase. Associate, Jo Clancy, looks at the reasons for this and considers whether there are any sensible measures which can be taken by drivers and/or pedestrians to remedy the situation.

Read More >


5 December 2022

Money or Quality of Life?

Which is more important to someone who has experienced life-changing injuries? A large sum of money or a new quality of life? The former is meaningless without the latter.

Read More >


14 August 2022

A collaborative and client centric approach

A collaborative and client centred approach in Scotland would lead to an imrpoved outcome for all.

Read More >


26 April 2022

Breaking the bias

Dear sirs, we're breaking the bias. More needs to be done to move towards true equality; this conversation cannot and should not be confined to just one day.

Read More >


20 February 2022

The new Highway Code – what’s all the fuss about?

Safe and courteous road users have nothing to worry about as far as the new Highway code rules are concerned


Read More >


16 November 2021

Road Safety Week 2021

RTALS are supporting Road Safety Week 2021 recognising the work undertaken by our Road Safety heroes. 

Read More >


31 October 2021


A defence in automatism has no place in Civil Law

Read More >


2 September 2021

It's all in the balance

Working a 4 day week may sound strange to many, but if a busy Law firm can make it work, then surely others will be able to follow suit.

Read More >


21 March 2021


When it comes to the question of who’s to blame in a road traffic incident, sometimes it is not entirely clear. 

Read More >


26 January 2021

The Courts are getting there virtually

There can be no going backwards now for the Civil courts after accepting a new virtual system for Court hearings.

Read More >


We cover the whole of Scotland and have solicitors based in the Borders, Central Belt and Aberdeen.

South of Scotland
5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
EH45 9BU


Happy Clients

Correspondance Address
16-20 Castle Street,





Scottish Legal Awards WinnerScottish legal Awards 2022

                   Contact Us
              Tel 0333 5557781



© 2023 RTA LAW LLP