21 March 2021



As a personal injury lawyer, specialising in representing those injured in road traffic collisions, I read with interest the decision of Lady Wise in the recently reported decision of Widowsons Executrix V Liberty Insurance Limited [2021] CSOH 15, OH.

The case was raised by the widow of John Widdowson (59), who was seriously injured in a road traffic accident on the 1st January 2016 and who subsequently died of his injuries on the 11th January 2016.
The First defender was the motor insurer of the late Daniel Gordon who caused the collision. The second and third defenders were NHS Grampian and NHS Highland having responsibility for Dr Grays Hospital, Elgin and Raigmore Hospital, Inverness respectively.

Daniel Gordon lost control of his vehicle on a bend. It was likely he attempted to negotiate the bend in excess of 80 mph. He crossed over the carriageway and collided with a car driven by Elizabeth McPhee. Mr Widdowson was a passenger in that vehicle. He was taken by ambulance to Dr Grays Hospital in Elgin where he remained overnight before discharge the following day. The next evening, he was admitted to Raigmore Hospital where he underwent surgery on the 8th of January 2016 but suffered a cardiac arrest and died on the 11th of January 2016.

All three defenders admitted liability to some extent and the quantification of damages was agreed with the remaining contentious issue being the apportionment of blame.

To determine where liability for the deceased’s death would lie, Lady Wise looked at the relative blameworthiness and causative potency of each defender. The undisputed facts of the case were the high degree of blameworthiness of the driver who had caused the collision through his reckless driving. The negligent act admitted by NHS Grampian was the failure to perform a CT scan to investigate internal injuries and the admitted negligence of NHS Highland was that of adopting a conservative course of management until the 7th of January. The surgical team departed from the accepted practice of urgent surgical intervention.

Lady Wise concluded that the deceased life-threatening injuries had been caused by the fault of the driver, but that there were opportunities thereafter to save the deceased’s life. Had surgery been performed on the 4th of January, on balance, the deceased would have survived the incident. In all the circumstances, she found the first defenders liable for 70% of the agreed damages, with the second and third defenders each liable for 15% of the damages awarded.

The apportionment of liability between different parties in road traffic collisions is not always a simple matter. Each case is assessed on its own merits and the attribution of fault to any one party is arrived at by consideration of blameworthiness and the respective causal potency.

The vulnerability of a particular category of road user is also relevant in apportionment of blame. For example, in the case of Hernandez v Arkar [2019] EWHC 72(QB), the claimant suffered life-changing injuries after a driver pulled out of a junction into his path. Hernandez was riding his motorcycle at a speed of between 45mph and 50mph in a 30mph zone in Hackney, London. The case was very balanced with regard to blame, as Hernandez was there to be seen. Hernandez’ speed was relevant when assessing blameworthiness, but the effect of his causative potency, being a vulnerable motorcyclist capable of bringing much less harm to the collision, tipped the balance in his favour. The Judge apportioned blame 60% to the driver and 40% to the motorcyclist.

In conclusion, when it comes to the question of who’s to blame in a road traffic incident, sometimes it is not entirely clear. We have all heard that if you run into the back on another driver, then you are to blame, but there may be other factors which lead to a different conclusion. People often look to the law for a clear black and white answer, but in reality, these matters are often more finely balanced shades of grey.

Thomas Mitchell – Solicitor


18 March 2024

Inspiring inclusion every day

The campaign theme for International Women's Day 2024 was Inspire Inclusion.

Read More >


26 January 2024

Road Crime and the Life time sentence myth

Summary of a RoadPeace webinar discussing road crime and why no one ever receives a lifetime sentence for killing someone by dangerous driving.

Read More >


22 December 2023

Empowering tomorrow's legal minds

A peek into my journey hosting work experience at RTA Law LLP with students from Peebles High School.

Read More >


11 December 2023

Eradicating the element of surprise

Brenda Mitchell, Senior Partner discusses the benefits of an Advanced driving course with The Institute of Advanced Motorists.

Read More >


24 November 2023

Twenty's plenty for us, isn’t it?

The key focus of Road Safety Week 2023 is on 'speed' so a debate about the introduction of 20mph speed limits is inevitable.

Read More >


12 November 2023

What's going on at the MIB

An increase in the time taken to process claims, a reduction in employee numbers and a significant hike in Directors remuneration is unacceptable and utterly shameful.

Read More >


31 August 2023

Work Experience for young students

We were delighted to be able to offer some work experience to two young students who wanted to find out more about what it's like to work in a niche practice law firm.

Read More >


16 July 2023

Poor maintenance causes increase in deaths

According to figures obtained from Police Scotland, road defects, especially potholes, have been blamed for 15 deaths and over 700 injuries since 2013 

Read More >


22 May 2023

The new autonomous future

Certainly, whilst it seems the future is already here, remote driving remains a legal grey area as its neither prohibited nor expressly allowed under current legislation.

Read More >


26 March 2023

Stormy seas for defence of automatism

The defence of automatism should not mean that parties injured due to the negligence of another should be left exposed and unprotected.

Read More >


23 February 2023

Improving Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrian fatalities appear to be on the increase. Associate, Jo Clancy, looks at the reasons for this and considers whether there are any sensible measures which can be taken by drivers and/or pedestrians to remedy the situation.

Read More >


5 December 2022

Money or Quality of Life?

Which is more important to someone who has experienced life-changing injuries? A large sum of money or a new quality of life? The former is meaningless without the latter.

Read More >


14 August 2022

A collaborative and client centric approach

A collaborative and client centred approach in Scotland would lead to an imrpoved outcome for all.

Read More >


26 April 2022

Breaking the bias

Dear sirs, we're breaking the bias. More needs to be done to move towards true equality; this conversation cannot and should not be confined to just one day.

Read More >


20 February 2022

The new Highway Code – what’s all the fuss about?

Safe and courteous road users have nothing to worry about as far as the new Highway code rules are concerned


Read More >


16 November 2021

Road Safety Week 2021

RTALS are supporting Road Safety Week 2021 recognising the work undertaken by our Road Safety heroes. 

Read More >


31 October 2021


A defence in automatism has no place in Civil Law

Read More >


2 September 2021

It's all in the balance

Working a 4 day week may sound strange to many, but if a busy Law firm can make it work, then surely others will be able to follow suit.

Read More >


21 March 2021


When it comes to the question of who’s to blame in a road traffic incident, sometimes it is not entirely clear. 

Read More >


26 January 2021

The Courts are getting there virtually

There can be no going backwards now for the Civil courts after accepting a new virtual system for Court hearings.

Read More >


We cover the whole of Scotland and have solicitors based in the Borders, Central Belt and Aberdeen.

South of Scotland
5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
EH45 9BU


Happy Clients

Correspondance Address
16-20 Castle Street,





Scottish Legal Awards WinnerScottish legal Awards 2022

                   Contact Us
              Tel 0333 5557781



© 2023 RTA LAW LLP