Scott v Gavigan (2016)

Scott v Gavigan Collision LocusThe pedestrian, Darren Scott, was injured when he took the decision to cross the road, across the path of a moped rider, Nicholas Gavin, coming the other way and who was travelling at the speed limit. The moped rider admitted not braking on his approach to the pedestrian.

The trial Judge found the fact that the moped rider should perhaps have braked earlier was the extent of his negligence. Holding the pedestrian entirely to blame, the Judge said the risk of the pedestrian crossing where he did (10 metres from a crossing as per the image above) was not one that the moped rider should have reasonably foreseen, the pedestrian’s responsibility was greater than the moped rider’s given his gross carelessness fuelled by alcohol consumption and that the action in crossing the road was of equal risk to the moped rider as it was to himself.

The case was appealed by the Pedestrian but was unsuccessful.

Pedestrian 100% to blame

The full case review can be viewed here

 
 

We cover the whole of Scotland and have solicitors based in the Borders, Central Belt and Aberdeen.

Central Scotland
4 Redheughs Rigg Westpoint,
South Gyle,
Edinburgh,
EH12 9DQ

South of Scotland
5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
Peebles,
EH45 9BU

 
 

Happy Clients
Testimonials
Blog

Correspondance Address
RTA LAW LLP
16-20 Castle Street,
Edinburgh,
EH2 3AT

 
 

   

 

 

Scottish Legal Awards Winner

                   Contact Us
              Tel 0333 5557781

 

 RTA LAW Logo

© 2022 RTA LAW LLP