26 January 2024

Road Crime and the Life time sentence myth


This week I had the privilege of joining a webinar hosted by RoadPeace. RoadPeace provide information and support services to people bereaved or seriously injured in road crashes.

The webinar’s panel consisted of Prof Sally Kyd, Head of Leicester Law School - an expert in criminal law specialising in road traffic offences, Calvin Buckley - whose partner, Frankie Julia Hough, and their unborn daughter, Neeve, were killed by a dangerous driver last year, Polly Herbert, a Road Traffic Injury Lawyer, who was Calvin’s solicitor in respect of a civil claim for damages following the death of Frankie and Nic Atkinson KC - a retired barrister and part-time judge, with a career spanning almost 50 years.

The webinar focused on the change in the law which came into force in 2022 in the form of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. The Act is needlessly complex but the main take away has been the increase in the maximum sentence for ‘causing death by dangerous driving’ from 14 years to life in prison. However, despite the increase in desire to have offenders spend a life time behind bars for killing on the road, a life sentence has yet to be a passed for causing death by dangerous driving.

Calvin, who spoke eloquently, told us about the sentence of 12 years imposed on a driver who had killed his partner and unborn daughter on the M66 in Greater Manchester. The driver had been travelling at speeds of up to 123mph, filming himself on his phone whilst doing so. The driver’s sentence was increased on appeal to 15 years imprisonment, but in Calvin’s view, this was not enough. Not only had Calvin to go through the traumatic appeals process, but the devastation caused following the sentence of 12 years being handed down in the original trial for not just Calvin, but Frankie’s wider family, was evident. Calvin’s view was that the whole focus of the trial had been to lessen the sentence imposed upon the driver. As a victim, he felt he had been utterly let down by the Justice System. The initial sentence was only remedied by the appeals procedure where recognition of the devastation of Frankie’s death on her wider family was considered. This then allowed a more appropriate sentence to be imposed upon the driver. Calvin felt the Court should have gone further still by imposing a life sentence upon the driver.

So, despite the change in the law, why are life sentences not being imposed in the most serious of cases? Polly Herbert, Calvin’s Solicitor, was able to provide some insight into this in respect of his civil claim. Government announced and promised back in 2017 that killer drivers would face life behind bars. However, between this announcement and the sentencing guidelines which are now in place, something has gone terribly wrong and instead sentencing recommendations have been paired back. Polly explained that following the trial referred to above, the Attorney General had met with both her and Calvin and explained that the only scenario where they envisaged a life sentence being passed for killing somebody on the roads, was if an offender had previously been convicted for causing death by dangerous driving, served a prison sentence, been released from prison and gone back out and killed again. Only then would a life sentence be imposed!

One of the most interesting insights during the webinar came from Nic Atkinson KC. His contribution focused on the Sentencing Council, a public body that is responsible for developing sentencing guidelines. His view was that despite the idea behind creation of the Council back in 2010 being that tougher, more uniform sentences for offences would be achieved, in fact the opposite had happened. He gave the example of Parliament passing a clear statutory provision for life imprisonment for those who kill on the road but, in his view, when it comes to sentencing, you often see a watering down of the principle which Parliament sought to impose due to the guidelines produced by the Sentencing Council, which Judges are compelled to follow.

The Sentencing Council set out a top tariff of 18 years as a maximum sentence for causing death by dangerous driving, not life. This balanced against sentencing discounts available for offenders who plead guilty at an early stage in judicial proceedings can result in sentences like the one passed in Frankie’s case where 12 years is a realistic outcome for causing her death, justifiably so according to the sentencing council.

Whilst the debate about tougher sentences will no doubt continue, I believe more consideration should be given to other forms of punishment and prevention. Prof Kyd made some interesting observations in relation to this. The imposition of lifetime driving bans should, in her view, be considered more widespread. This is an option available to a Court and Prof Kyd discussed the case of Noble from 2002. In that case, the Court of Appeal accepted that where an individual is seen to be a danger on the road indefinitely, it would be appropriate to impose a lifetime driving ban. Prof Kyd blamed the car culture in this country as the reason why this type of sentencing isn’t more widespread.

Whilst there is universal agreement that any death on the roads is one too many, there is not universal agreement about how we tackle this issue from preventing the incident in the first place, to dealing with the fall out after. Whilst Judges do now have the power to hand down stiffer sentences to those who kill on the roads, my view is that much more must be done by way of prevention. The bereaved serve lifelong sentences of their own and no amount of punishment or custodial sentencing will ever make up for the loss of a loved one.

A recording of the webinar can be found on YouTube

Thomas Mitchell


18 March 2024

Inspiring inclusion every day

The campaign theme for International Women's Day 2024 was Inspire Inclusion.

Read More >


26 January 2024

Road Crime and the Life time sentence myth

Summary of a RoadPeace webinar discussing road crime and why no one ever receives a lifetime sentence for killing someone by dangerous driving.

Read More >


22 December 2023

Empowering tomorrow's legal minds

A peek into my journey hosting work experience at RTA Law LLP with students from Peebles High School.

Read More >


11 December 2023

Eradicating the element of surprise

Brenda Mitchell, Senior Partner discusses the benefits of an Advanced driving course with The Institute of Advanced Motorists.

Read More >


24 November 2023

Twenty's plenty for us, isn’t it?

The key focus of Road Safety Week 2023 is on 'speed' so a debate about the introduction of 20mph speed limits is inevitable.

Read More >


12 November 2023

What's going on at the MIB

An increase in the time taken to process claims, a reduction in employee numbers and a significant hike in Directors remuneration is unacceptable and utterly shameful.

Read More >


31 August 2023

Work Experience for young students

We were delighted to be able to offer some work experience to two young students who wanted to find out more about what it's like to work in a niche practice law firm.

Read More >


16 July 2023

Poor maintenance causes increase in deaths

According to figures obtained from Police Scotland, road defects, especially potholes, have been blamed for 15 deaths and over 700 injuries since 2013 

Read More >


22 May 2023

The new autonomous future

Certainly, whilst it seems the future is already here, remote driving remains a legal grey area as its neither prohibited nor expressly allowed under current legislation.

Read More >


26 March 2023

Stormy seas for defence of automatism

The defence of automatism should not mean that parties injured due to the negligence of another should be left exposed and unprotected.

Read More >


23 February 2023

Improving Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrian fatalities appear to be on the increase. Associate, Jo Clancy, looks at the reasons for this and considers whether there are any sensible measures which can be taken by drivers and/or pedestrians to remedy the situation.

Read More >


5 December 2022

Money or Quality of Life?

Which is more important to someone who has experienced life-changing injuries? A large sum of money or a new quality of life? The former is meaningless without the latter.

Read More >


14 August 2022

A collaborative and client centric approach

A collaborative and client centred approach in Scotland would lead to an imrpoved outcome for all.

Read More >


26 April 2022

Breaking the bias

Dear sirs, we're breaking the bias. More needs to be done to move towards true equality; this conversation cannot and should not be confined to just one day.

Read More >


20 February 2022

The new Highway Code – what’s all the fuss about?

Safe and courteous road users have nothing to worry about as far as the new Highway code rules are concerned


Read More >


16 November 2021

Road Safety Week 2021

RTALS are supporting Road Safety Week 2021 recognising the work undertaken by our Road Safety heroes. 

Read More >


31 October 2021


A defence in automatism has no place in Civil Law

Read More >


2 September 2021

It's all in the balance

Working a 4 day week may sound strange to many, but if a busy Law firm can make it work, then surely others will be able to follow suit.

Read More >


21 March 2021


When it comes to the question of who’s to blame in a road traffic incident, sometimes it is not entirely clear. 

Read More >


26 January 2021

The Courts are getting there virtually

There can be no going backwards now for the Civil courts after accepting a new virtual system for Court hearings.

Read More >


We cover the whole of Scotland and have solicitors based in the Borders, Central Belt and Aberdeen.

South of Scotland
5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
EH45 9BU


Happy Clients

Correspondance Address
16-20 Castle Street,





Scottish Legal Awards WinnerScottish legal Awards 2022

                   Contact Us
              Tel 0333 5557781



© 2023 RTA LAW LLP